Minutes: IAGA 1997On August 6, 1997 IAGA Division V - Working Group 2 (now V-DAT) met in Uppsala, Sweden. The Co-Chairs David Boteler and Susan McLean headed discussions on several topics including the merger of applications, indices, forecasting and data services. It was suggested that Task Forces be set up for each of the Working Group focus areas. A tribute was paid to Anich Berthelier, who died March 1997 and it was recommended Michel Menvielle replace Anich as co-chair for indices. This was approved and accepted. Other topics discussed and described in more detail below include the proposal to adopt a new Polar Cap (PC) index and the problem of "pseudo" indices. The Working Group proposed two Resolutions (see the IAGA Web for current Resolutions). For current information on the IAGA Executive Committee and Latest Resolutions, visit the IAGA homepage. Task Force | Reports on Indices | Pseduo Indices | Resolutions Task Forces were implemented for the four focus areas of the Working Group. The head of each task force and the current members are noted below. Information on the activities of each task force will be posted as it becomes available . Task Forces:
Reports on Indices were given by Kevin Ivory (Kp), Hans-Joachim Linthe (Kp), Michel Menvielle (ISGI and a indices), T. Kamei (Dst and AE), JJ Curto (Rapid Magnetic Variations), and O. Troshichev (PC). The Task Force on Indices will work with Dr. Troshichev to develop a report on the Polar Cap index by August 1998. The Task Force will forward the report to David Boteler for circulation to the community so action can be taken concerning the adoption of the PC index at the next IAGA. David will submit an item to the IAGA News expressing the intention of the WG-V2 to adopt the Polar Cap (PC) index as an IAGA index in 1999.
Problem of "Pseudo" Indices Several attendees expressed concern over the number of "psuedo" indices currently being computed and being referenced in the liturature. The official IAGA indices are produced by the institutes mentioned above, and nowhere else. The "label" of the real index should be reserved for official producers for funding reason. However, there are definate needs for estimated indices for real-time and near-real-time applications. In certain uses, other institutes are computing similar indices. The group agreed that these "psuedo" indices should be clearly labeled to avoid confusion with the actual indice. A resolution was proposed to add "est" to the label of any estimated indices computed, i.e. Kpest and Apest. The group also recommends that the "pseudo" indices not be referenced in reports or journals and we work to educate the public. The following resolutions were submitted by the Working Group: Resolution # 4. Resolution # 5. Resolution # 6. IAGA, recognising the importance of geomagnetic activity indices for characterisation and prediction of a wide range of geomagnetic phenomena, and noting the particular value of long time-series of such indices, thanks the staff of observing stations that contribute data, the organisations that produce, disseminate, and publish indices and the national funding agencies that support these activities. The following other issues and concerns were discussed at the meeting.
| ||||||||||||
|
Sessions submitted for IAGA 1999
|
For page content questions please contact: Alan W.P. Thomson |
|
|
|
|