ISO Table View View Metadata As: Get Data, FAQ, HTML, 19139 XML
Assess Metadata For: Completeness, DOI Readiness, CSW Readiness, Components

Metadata Identifier: gov.noaa.ngdc.mgg.photos:G01205

Aggregation Info | Bands | Citations | Constraints | Coverage Descriptions | Dimensions | Extents | Formats | Geographic Bounding Box
Georectified Information | Georeferenceable Information | Identifiers | Instruments | Mediums | OnlineResources | Operations
Platforms | Process Steps | Range Elements | Reference Systems | Responsible Parties | Series | Sources | Spatial Grids | Temporal Extents

MD_DataIdentification

Count Component Title Abstract
1 Loma Prieta Earthquake, October 18, 1989, Part 1 On October 17, 1989, a 7.1 magnitude earthquake occurred near Loma Prieta in the Santa Cruz Mountains. Movement occurred along a 40-km segment of the San Andreas fault from southwestof Los Gatos to north of San Juan Bautista. This slide set includes damage in the more rural areas affected by the quake including: Boulder Creek, Aptos, Los Gatos, San Jose, Scott's Valley, and Watsonville. The slides also depict earth cracks and structural damage to homes in the Santa Cruz Mountains.Effects in Loma Prieta Vicinity - On October 17, 1989, at 5:04 P.M. (PDT), a 7.1 magnitude earthquake occurred near Loma Prieta in the Santa Cruz mountains, California. Movement occurred along a 40-km segment of the San Andreas fault from southwest of Los Gatos to north of San Juan Bautista. Measurements along Earth's surface after the earthquake show that the Pacific plate moved 1.9 m to the northwest and 1.3 m upward over the North American plate. The upward motion resulted from deformation of the plate boundary at the bend in the San Andreas fault. At the surface, the fault motion was evident as a complexseries of cracks and fractures. This earthquake was not unexpected. During the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, there was only about one meter of movement on the Santa Cruz segment of the San Andreas fault. Farther north in the San Francisco area, there was more than 2.5 m of movement. This indicated that all of thestrain had not been released in the Santa Cruz segment in the 1906 earthquake so this segment was likely to break before the northern segment. Thousands of landslides occurred throughout the area blocking roads and highways, hampering rescue efforts and causing damage to structures. Landslides were particularly prevalent in the Santa Cruz mountains, where they occur regularly even without earthquakes. These slides resulted in at least two deaths. One slump slide near Laurel took with it several dozen houses damaging them severely. Thirty percent of the buildings in the Pacific Garden Mall in downtown Santa Cruz were damaged severely by amplified ground shaking and ground deformation. The mall lies on unconsolidated deposits. One hundred thirty buildings-many dating from the 19th Century-were damaged in this historic section. Several hundred houses were either severely damaged or destroyed. The worst ground shaking appeared to occur in the Santa Cruz Mountains close to the epicenter. Many buildings were damaged or destroyed by ground cracking and shaking and by landsliding. Scores of mountain homes were also destroyed. Initial damages were estimated at $350 million in Santa Cruz. In Watsonville, two adjacent buildings of a department store sustained extensive structural damage due to a weak first story, insufficient shear reinforcement of the columns, and possible pounding of the two structures. Recently constructed buildings with tilt-up walls performed well. At the Stanford University campus, 30 miles northwest of the epicenter, 60 buildings sustained varying degrees of damage, with an estimated repair cost of $160 million. Concrete sidewalks and curbs were systematically fractured and buckled on northeast trending streets throughout downtown Los Gatos. Hollister also experienced severe damage. Sand boils appear in irrigated fields near Hollister. San Jose and Gilroy also reported collapsed and damaged buildings. Boulder Creek, Redwood Estates, Los Gatos, Scott's Valley, Santa Cruz, and Watsonville all experienced strong ground shaking and had a high percentage of damaged structures. These towns were only 16 to 32 km from the epicenter. The older structures in these towns were vulnerable for one or more of the following reasons: deterioration of the structure, lack of ties to the foundation, unreinforced masonry (brick or stone), lack of shear resistance in the ground floor, pounding of adjacent structures, and timber diaphragms not tied to unreinforced masonry walls, which allowed separation or pushing out of the walls. In the epicentral area most of the damage resulted from the strong ground shaking and landsliding. Ground shaking primarily affected unreinforced masonry structures, and was enhanced in areas of fine-grained sand. Landslides occurred on steep slopes where ground shaking was most severe.
Top

SV_Identification

none found
Top

CI_Citation

Count Component Title Date Citation Identifier
1 Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names
    1 INFOTERRA Keyword Thesaurus
      1 Loma Prieta Earthquake, October 18, 1989, Part 1
      • 1994
      Document
      1 NASA/GCMD Data Center Keywords
        1 NASA/GCMD Earth Science Keywords
          1 Uncontrolled Keywords
            Top

            CI_Series

            none found
            Top

            CI_ResponsibleParty

            Count Component Individual Organization Position Email Role Linkage
            1 DOC/NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC > National Geophysical Data Center, NESDIS, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce (comp) originator
            1 Heather McCullough DOC/NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC > National Geophysical Data Center, NESDIS, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce Heather.McCullough@noaa.gov http://www.isotc211.org/2005/resources/Codelist/gmxCodelists.xml#CI_RoleCode
            1 Heather McCullough DOC/NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC > National Geophysical Data Center, NESDIS, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce Heather.McCullough@noaa.gov pointOfContact
            1 Heather McCullough DOC/NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC > National Geophysical Data Center, NESDIS, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce Heather.McCullough@noaa.gov custodian
            1 National Geophysical Data Center publisher
            1 User Services DOC/NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC > National Geophysical Data Center, NESDIS, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce ngdc.info@noaa.gov distributor
            Top

            CI_OnlineResource

            Count Component Linkage Name Description Function
            1 http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/hazard/
            2 http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/nndc/struts/results?eq_1=12&t=101634&s=0&d=4&d=44
            Top

            MD_Identifier or RS_Identifier

            Count Component Code
            1 Document
            Top

            EX_Extent

            Bounding Box Temporal Extent
            Count Component Description West East North South Start End
            1 -122.24 122.13 37.48 -37.43 1989-10-17 1989-10-31
            Top

            EX_GeographicBoundingBox

            Count Component West East North South
            1 -122.24 122.13 37.48 -37.43
            Top

            EX_TemporalExtent

            Count Component Start End
            1 1989-10-17 1989-10-31
            Top

            MD_Format

            Count Component Name Version specification
            2 TIFF
            Top

            MD_Medium

            Count Component Name mediumFormat mediumNote
            1 cdRom iso9660
            Top

            MD_Constraints

            Count Component Use Limitation
            Top

            MD_ReferenceSystem

            none found
            Top

            MD_GridSpatialRepresentation

            none found
            Top

            MD_Georeferenceable or MI_Georeferenceable

            none found
            Top

            MD_Georectified or MI_Georectified

            none found
            Top

            MD_Dimension

            none found
            Top

            MD_CoverageDescription or MI_CoverageDescription

            none found
            Top

            MD_Band or MI_Band

            none found
            Top

            MI_RangeElementDescription

            none found
            Top

            MD_AggregateInformation

            none found
            Top

            LE_Source or LI_Source

            none found
            Top

            LE_ProcessStep or LI_ProcessStep

            none found
            Top

            MI_Operation

            none found
            Top

            MI_Platform

            none found
            Top

            MI_Instrument

            none found
            Top