ISO Table View View Metadata As: Get Data, FAQ, HTML, 19139 XML
Assess Metadata For: Completeness, DOI Readiness, CSW Readiness, Components

Metadata Identifier: gov.noaa.csc.maps:200310_SCRIPPS_m49

Aggregation Info | Bands | Citations | Constraints | Coverage Descriptions | Dimensions | Extents | Formats | Geographic Bounding Box
Georectified Information | Georeferenceable Information | Identifiers | Instruments | Mediums | OnlineResources | Operations
Platforms | Process Steps | Range Elements | Reference Systems | Responsible Parties | Series | Sources | Spatial Grids | Temporal Extents

MD_DataIdentification

Count Component Title Abstract
1 October 2003 Lidar Point Data of Southern California Coastline: Newport Beach to US/Mexican Border This data set contains lidar point data (Geodetic Coordinates) from a strip of Southern California coastline (including water, beach, cliffs, and top of cliffs) from Newport Beach to the US/Mexico border. The data set was created by combining data collected using an Optech Inc. Airborne Laser Terrain Mapper (ALTM) 1225 in combination with geodetic quality Global Positioning System (GPS) airborne and ground-based receivers. The Bureau of Economic Geology, the University of Texas at Austin owns and operates an ALTM 1225 system (serial number 99d118). The system was installed in a twin engine Partenavia P-68 (tail number N6602L) owned and operated by Aspen Helicopter, Inc. The lidar data set described by this document was collected on 24 and 25 October 2003; Julian Days 29703 and 29803 (see Lineage, Source_Information, Source_Contribution for pass information). Conditions on both days were haze, low clouds, and smoke over Los Angeles and Camp Pendleton. 99d118 instrument settings for these flights were; laser pulse rate: 25kHz, scanner rate: 26Hz, scan angle: +/- 20deg, beam divergence: narrow, altitude: 1038-1106m AGL, and ground speed: 99-119kts. Three GPS base stations (Seal Beach, Dana Point, and Point Loma, see Lineage, Source_Information, Source_Contribution for coordinates) were operating during the survey. Data represented is all points including terrain, vegetation, and structures. This data also contains returns from the water surface. No processing has been done to remove returns from terrain, vegetation, structures or water surfaces.
Top

SV_Identification

none found
Top

CI_Citation

Count Component Title Date Citation Identifier
1 Air and Ground GPS files from 08703 and 08803
  • 2003-10-25
1 North American Datum 1983
  • 2007-01-19
1 October 2003 Lidar Point Data of Southern California Coastline: Newport Beach to US/Mexican Border
  • 2004-08-31
1 Raw lidar data output from ALTM 1225
  • 2003-10-25
3 none
    Top

    CI_Series

    none found
    Top

    CI_ResponsibleParty

    Count Component Individual Organization Position Email Role Linkage
    1 resourceProvider http://www.epsg-registry.org/export.htm?gml=urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4269
    3 Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas at Austin originator
    1 Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas at Austin Coastal Studies Group Member processor
    1 Center for Space Research, University of Texas at Austin originator
    1 NOAA CSC (originator) DOC/NOAA/NOS/CSC > Coastal Services Center, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce csc.info@noaa.gov originator
    1 NOAA CSC (publisher) DOC/NOAA/NOS/CSC > Coastal Services Center, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce csc.info@noaa.gov publisher
    1 NOAA CSC(distributor) DOC/NOAA/NOS/CSC > Coastal Services Center, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce csc.info@noaa.gov distributor
    1 NOAA CSC (processor) DOC/NOAA/NOS/CSC > Coastal Services Center, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce csc.info@noaa.gov processor
    1 EPSG Registry European Petroleum Survey Group publisher http://www.epsg-registry.org/
    1 Julie Thomas/Randy Bucciarelli SCBPS/CDIP, Scripps Institution of Oceanography Project Managers pointOfContact
    1 Mike Sutherland(author) Mike Sutherland DOC/NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC > National Geophysical Data Center, NESDIS, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce mike.sutherland@noaa.gov author
    1 Mike Sutherland Mike Sutherland DOC/NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC > National Geophysical Data Center, NESDIS, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce mike.sutherland@noaa.gov distributor
    1 Pamela Grothe DOC/NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC > National Geophysical Data Center, NESDIS, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce processor
    1 Scripps Institute of Oceanography originator
    1 Southern California Beach Processes Study (SCBPS)/Coastal Data Information Program (CDIP) part of Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIO) in cooperation with Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas at Austin. originator
    Top

    CI_OnlineResource

    Count Component Linkage Name Description Function
    1 http://www.epsg-registry.org/ European Petroleum Survey Group Geodetic Parameter Registry Registry that accesses the EPSG Geodetic Parameter Dataset, which is a structured dataset of Coordinate Reference Systems and Coordinate Transformations. search
    1 http://www.epsg-registry.org/export.htm?gml=urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4269 NAD83 Link to Geographic Markup Language (GML) description of reference system. information
    Top

    MD_Identifier or RS_Identifier

    Count Component Code
    1 Ellipsoid in Meters
    1 urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4269
    Top

    EX_Extent

    Bounding Box Temporal Extent
    Count Component Description West East North South Start End
    1 -117.953012 -117.247212 33.627756 32.749956 2003-10-24 2003-10-25
    2 2003-10-24 2003-10-25
    Top

    EX_GeographicBoundingBox

    Count Component West East North South
    1 -117.953012 -117.247212 33.627756 32.749956
    Top

    EX_TemporalExtent

    Count Component Start End
    3 2003-10-24 2003-10-25
    Top

    MD_Format

    Count Component Name Version specification
    1 LAZ
    Top

    MD_Medium

    none found
    Top

    MD_Constraints

    Count Component Use Limitation
    1 Lidar Use Limitation These data depict the elevations at the time of the survey and are only accurate for that time. Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this data set was collected and some parts of this data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use this data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations. Any conclusions drawn from analysis of this information are not the responsibility of NOAA or any of its partners. These data are NOT to be used for navigational purposes.
    Top

    MD_ReferenceSystem

    Count Component Code Authority Title
    1 Ellipsoid Ellipsoid in Meters
    1 NAD83 urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4269 North American Datum 1983
    Top

    MD_GridSpatialRepresentation

    none found
    Top

    MD_Georeferenceable or MI_Georeferenceable

    none found
    Top

    MD_Georectified or MI_Georectified

    none found
    Top

    MD_Dimension

    none found
    Top

    MD_CoverageDescription or MI_CoverageDescription

    none found
    Top

    MD_Band or MI_Band

    none found
    Top

    MI_RangeElementDescription

    none found
    Top

    MD_AggregateInformation

    none found
    Top

    LE_Source or LI_Source

    Count Component Title Date Description
    1 Air and Ground GPS files from 08703 and 08803 2003-10-25 Source Contribution: GPS data. Air and ground GPS files base station coordinates (Easting, Northing, HAE) in NAD83: Seal Beach (SEAL) = 399190.342, 3733583.950, -27.228 Dana Point (DANA) = 434088.848, 3702981.811, 52.916 Point Loma (LOMA) = 477399.682, 3614791.197, 90.892 Source Type: digital file
    1 Raw lidar data output from ALTM 1225 2003-10-25 Source Contribution: Raw lidar data files. Raw lidar data from ALTM 1225 (all times UTC) 29703 Strip 1 (Newport Beach to Dana Point) = 22:13-22:20 Strip 2 (Dana Point to Oceanside) = 22:22-22:34 Strip 3 (Oceanside to Dana Point) = 22:35-22:47 Strip 4 (Dana Point to Oceanside) = 22:49-23:00 Strip 5 (Oceanside to Dana Point) = 23:02-23:14 Strip 6 (Dana Point to Newport Beach) = 23:16-23:25 Strip 7 (Newport Beach to Dana Point) = 23:26-23:33 Strip 8 (Dana Point to Newport Beach) = 23:35-23:46 Pass A=Strip 1 and 2, Pass B=Strip3, Pass C=Strip 4, Pass D=Strip 5 and 6, Pass E=Strip 7, and Pass F=Strip 8 29803 Strip 1 (Oceanside to Point Loma) = 21:28-21:52 Strip 2 (Point Loma to Mexico) = 21:54-22:02 Strip 3 (Mexico to Point Loma) = 22:08-22:17 Strip 4 (Point Loma to Point La Jolla) = 22:20-22:29 Strip 5 (La Jolla to Camp Pendleton) = 22:31-22:45 Pass A=Strip 1 and 2 and Pass B=Strip 3, 4, and 5 Source Type: digital file
    Top

    LE_ProcessStep or LI_ProcessStep

    Count Component DateTime Description
    1 2004-08-02T00:00:00 GPS and XYZ-Point Data Processing The National Geodetic Survey's PAGES-NT software was used to compute double differenced, ionospherically corrected, static GPS solutions for each GPS base station with precise ephemeredes from the International GPS Service (IGS). As part of the solution tropospheric zenith delays were estimated and L1 and L2 phase biases were fixed as integers. Aircraft trajectories were estimated with respect to all base stations using National Geodetic Survey's Kinematic and Rapid-Static Software (KARS) software. Trajectories were double-differenced, ionospherically corrected, bias-fixed GPS solutions computed with precise IGS ephemeredes. Coordinates for base stations and trajectories were in the International Terrestrial Reference Frame of 2000 (ITRF00). The aircraft trajectory were transformed from the ITRF00 to North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83) using the Horizontal Time Dependent Positioning (HDTP) software (Snay, 1999) The 1Hz GPS trajectory and 50Hz aircraft inertial measurement unit (IMU) data were combined in Applanix's POSProc version 2.1.4 to compute an aided inertial navigation solution (INS) and a 50Hz, smoothed best estimate of trajectory (SBET). The SBET, laser range observations, scanner position information, and GPS/internal clock files were processed in Realm 2.27 software suite to generate lidar data points in the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection. Lidar point data were compared to GPS ground survey data and 1998 ATM lidar data to estimate lidar instrument calibration parameters: roll and pitch biases, scanner scale factor, and first/last return elevation biases. An iterative, least-squares methodology was used to estimate calibration parameters so as to minimize differences between lidar and ground GPS data. Samples of lidar data were used to create high-resolution digital elevation models (DEM); these DEM were inspected for horizontal or vertical anomalies. After system calibration and initial quality control step, the adjusted lidar x,y,z-point data were generated by REALM software and output, by shoreline pass, in UTM Zone 11 with elevations being heights above the GRS-80 reference ellipsoid (HAE). The output format from REALM 2.27 was a 9-column ASCII file containing: the second in the GPS week, easting, northing and HAE of the first lidar return, the easting, northing and HAE of the last lidar return, and the laser backscatter intensity of the first and last returns. Using the GEOID99 geoid model, heights above the GRS80 ellipsoid were converted to orthometric heights with respect to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88). Parse the 9-column lidar point file into 3.75-minute quarter-quadrangle components. Convert UTM Easting and Northing to geodetic latitude and longitude with respect to the GRS80 ellipsoid. The conversion was computed using the TMGEOD and TCONPC fortran subroutines written by T. Vincenty (NGS). Each record contains 9 columns of data: time tag (seconds in the GPS week), first return Latitude, first return Longitude, first return NAVD88, last return Latitude, last return Longitude, last return NAVD88, first return intensity, and last return intensity. In some cases either the first or last return values may be missing (5 columns). Latitude and longitude are in decimal degrees with nine significant digits to retain the 0.01m resolution of the UTM coordinates. West longitude is negative and north latitude is positive. The UTM quarter-quad files were re-organized into latitude delineated files. UTM quarter-quads files that were delineated by the same upper and lower latitude bounds were concatenated. The lat-long files were named by the month-year of the survey (e.g. mar03) and the lower latitude bounding the quarter-quad.
    1 2007-07-24T00:00:00 The NOAA Coastal Services Center (CSC) received files in ASCII format. The files contained LiDAR intensity and elevation measurements. CSC performed the following processing on the data to make it available within the LiDAR Data Retrieval Tool (LDART) 1. Data returned to ellipsoid heights from NAVD88, using GEOID99. 2. Data converted to LAS format. 3. The LAS data were sorted by latitude and the headers were updated.
    1 2007-12-26T00:00:00 The NOAA National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC) received lidar data files via ftp transfer from the NOAA Coastal Services Center. The data are currently being served via NOAA CSC Digital Coast at http://www.csc.noaa.gov/digitalcoast/. The data can be used to re-populate the system. The data are archived in LAS or LAZ format. The LAS format is an industry standard for LiDAR data developed by the American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS); LAZ is a loseless compressed version of LAS developed by Martin Isenburg (http://www.laszip.org/). The data are exclusively in geographic coordinates (either NAD83 or ITRF94). The data are referenced vertically to the ellipsoid (either GRS80 or ITRF94), allowing for the ability to apply the most up to date geoid model when transforming to orthometric heights.
    Top

    MI_Operation

    none found
    Top

    MI_Platform

    none found
    Top

    MI_Instrument

    none found
    Top