ISO Table View Alternate Views: Get Data, FAQ, ISO Rubric, DOI Rubric, CSW, HTML, Components, XML

Metadata Identifier: gov.noaa.csc.maps:2007_FDEM_Indian_River_m539

Aggregation Info | Bands | Citations | Constraints | Coverage Descriptions | Dimensions | Extents | Formats | Geographic Bounding Box
Georectified Information | Georeferenceable Information | Identifiers | Instruments | Mediums | OnlineResources | Operations
Platforms | Process Steps | Range Elements | Reference Systems | Responsible Parties | Series | Sources | Spatial Grids | Temporal Extents

MD_DataIdentification

Count Component Title Abstract
1 2007 Florida Division of Emergency Management (FDEM) Lidar Project: Eastern Indian River County This Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) LAS dataset is a topographic survey conducted for a coalition of GIS practitioners, including the Florida Division of Emergency Management (FDEM), Florida Water Management Districts, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Army Corps of Engineers Jacksonville District, and other state and federal agencies. The goal for this project is to use the LiDAR data as new elevation inputs for updated SLOSH data grids. The ultimate result is the update of the Regional Hurricane Evacuation Studies (RHES) for the state. The State of Florida Division of Emergency Management LiDAR Survey was collected under the guidance of a Professional Mapper/Surveyor. Data were collected for 255 square miles in the eastern portion of Indian River County, Florida from August 24 - 28, 2007. This is a classified lidar data set. The data are classified: 1 = Unclassified, 2 = Ground (Bare Earth), 7 = Noise, 9 = Water and 12 = Overlap. The data was collected at a maximum post spacing of 4 feet in unobscured areas for random point data.
Top

SV_Identification

none found
Top

CI_Citation

Count Component Title Date Citation Identifier
1 2007 Florida Division of Emergency Management (FDEM) Lidar Project: Eastern Indian River County
  • 2008-01-01
1 Lidar Final Report
    1 Lidar QA/QC Report
      1 North American Datum 1983
      • 2007-01-19
      1 State of Florida Division of Emergency Management LiDAR Project Survey
      • 2008-03-27
      2 none
        Top

        CI_Series

        none found
        Top

        CI_ResponsibleParty

        Count Component Individual Organization Position Email Role Linkage
        1 resourceProvider http://www.epsg-registry.org/export.htm?gml=urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4269
        2 Citation URL ftp://ftp.csc.noaa.gov/pub/crs/beachmap/qa_docs/fl/fdem/indian_river/WOOLPERT%20LiDAR%20INDIAN%20RIVER%20CO%20MTS%20REPORT%20VOL%202%20REVISED.pdf
        1 NOAA CSC (originator) DOC/NOAA/NOS/CSC > Coastal Services Center, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce csc.info@noaa.gov originator
        1 NOAA CSC (publisher) DOC/NOAA/NOS/CSC > Coastal Services Center, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce csc.info@noaa.gov publisher
        1 NOAA CSC(distributor) DOC/NOAA/NOS/CSC > Coastal Services Center, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce csc.info@noaa.gov distributor
        1 NOAA CSC (processor) DOC/NOAA/NOS/CSC > Coastal Services Center, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce csc.info@noaa.gov processor
        1 EPSG Registry European Petroleum Survey Group publisher http://www.epsg-registry.org/
        1 Florida DEM gis@dca.state.fl.us pointOfContact
        1 Florida DEM originator
        1 Florida Division of Emergency Management (FDEM) originator
        1 Mike Sutherland(author) Mike Sutherland DOC/NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC > National Geophysical Data Center, NESDIS, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce mike.sutherland@noaa.gov author
        1 Mike Sutherland Mike Sutherland DOC/NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC > National Geophysical Data Center, NESDIS, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce mike.sutherland@noaa.gov distributor
        1 Pamela Grothe DOC/NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC > National Geophysical Data Center, NESDIS, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce processor
        1 Richard R. Hudson, PE, PSM, CP Woolpert, Inc. Project Manager www.woolpert.com processor
        1 Woolpert, Inc. originator
        Top

        CI_OnlineResource

        Count Component Linkage Name Description Function
        1 ftp://ftp.csc.noaa.gov/pub/crs/beachmap/qa_docs/fl/fdem/indian_river/WOOLPERT%20LiDAR%20INDIAN%20RIVER%20CO%20MTS%20REPORT%20VOL%202%20REVISED.pdf Lidar Final Report information
        1 ftp://ftp.csc.noaa.gov/pub/crs/beachmap/qa_docs/fl/fdem/indian_river/WOOLPERT%20LiDAR%20INDIAN%20RIVER%20CO%20MTS%20VOL%201%20REVISED.PDF Lidar QA/QC Report information
        1 http://www.epsg-registry.org/ European Petroleum Survey Group Geodetic Parameter Registry Registry that accesses the EPSG Geodetic Parameter Dataset, which is a structured dataset of Coordinate Reference Systems and Coordinate Transformations. search
        1 http://www.epsg-registry.org/export.htm?gml=urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4269 NAD83 Link to Geographic Markup Language (GML) description of reference system. information
        Top

        MD_Identifier or RS_Identifier

        Count Component Code
        1 Ellipsoid in Meters
        1 urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4269
        Top

        EX_Extent

        Bounding Box Temporal Extent
        Count Component Description West East North South Start End
        1 -80.617170 -80.309070 27.867889 27.550789 2007-08-24 2007-08-28
        1
        Top

        EX_GeographicBoundingBox

        Count Component West East North South
        1 -80.617170 -80.309070 27.867889 27.550789
        Top

        EX_TemporalExtent

        Count Component Start End
        1 2007-08-24 2007-08-28
        1
        Top

        MD_Format

        Count Component Name Version specification
        1 LAZ
        Top

        MD_Medium

        none found
        Top

        MD_Constraints

        Count Component Use Limitation
        1 Lidar Use Limitation These data depict the elevations at the time of the survey and are only accurate for that time. Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this data set was collected and some parts of this data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use this data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations. Any conclusions drawn from analysis of this information are not the responsibility of NOAA or any of its partners. These data are NOT to be used for navigational purposes.
        Top

        MD_ReferenceSystem

        Count Component Code Authority Title
        1 Ellipsoid Ellipsoid in Meters
        1 NAD83 urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4269 North American Datum 1983
        Top

        MD_GridSpatialRepresentation

        none found
        Top

        MD_Georeferenceable or MI_Georeferenceable

        none found
        Top

        MD_Georectified or MI_Georectified

        none found
        Top

        MD_Dimension

        none found
        Top

        MD_CoverageDescription or MI_CoverageDescription

        none found
        Top

        MD_Band or MI_Band

        none found
        Top

        MI_RangeElementDescription

        none found
        Top

        MD_AggregateInformation

        Count Component Title Code Association Type Code
        1 Lidar Final Report crossReference
        1 Lidar QA/QC Report crossReference
        Top

        LE_Source or LI_Source

        Count Component Title Date Description
        1 State of Florida Division of Emergency Management LiDAR Project Survey 2008-03-27 Source Contribution: The LiDAR Project Survey was acquired for the Florida Division of Emergency Management and processed by Woolpert Inc. To collect the breaklines the LiDAR data was used as the main source data set in addition to orthophotography. Orthophoto imagery was from new imagery collected and developed by the Woolpert Team. All imagery for Indian River County is dated 2007 with a 0.5 foot pixel resolution. Source Type: disc
        Top

        LE_ProcessStep or LI_ProcessStep

        Count Component DateTime Description
        1 2009-01-05T00:00:00 LiDAR was collected within portions of Indian River County. System Parameters/Flight Plan: The LiDAR system acquisition parameters were developed based on a maximum average ground sample distance of 4 feet. Two Leica ALS50 sensors were used for acquisition. Acquisition specifications for the two sensors were as follows: Sensor 19 Field of View (full angle) - 29 degrees Nominal flight altitude (AMSL) - 3999.30 feet Airspeed - 54.02 meters/sec Laser pulse rate - 75,000 Hz Nominal swath width (on ground) - 2068.58 feet Maximum cross track point spacing - 3.91 feet Maximum along track point spacing - 3.94 feet Average point spacing - 2.21 feet Flight line spacing - 1544.95 feet Side overlap - 25.31%. Sensor 59 Field of View (full angle) - 29 degrees Nominal flight altitude (AMSL) - 3999.30 feet Airspeed - 60.70 meters/sec Laser pulse rate - 84,400 Hz Nominal swath width (on ground) - 2068.58 feet Maximum cross track point spacing - 3.94 feet Maximum along track point spacing - 3.91 feet Average point spacing - 2.21 feet Flight line spacing - 1413.72 feet Side overlap - 31.66%. LiDAR System Calibration: Prior to the LiDAR acquisition, the system underwent a calibration to verify the operational accuracy and misalignment angles. Boresight calibrations were performed for each LiDAR system at the beginning and end of each flight mission. LiDAR Data Acquisition: LiDAR data acquisition only occurred when the sky was sufficiently clear of clouds, smoke, and atmospheric haze. The LiDAR data was processed immediately after the acquisition to verify the coverage had no voids. GPS/Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) Post Processing: The GPS and IMU data was post processed using differential and Kalman filter algorithms to derive a best estimate of trajectory. The quality of the solution was verified to be consistent with the accuracy requirements of the project. LiDAR Processing and Classification: The LiDAR data was post processed and verified to be consistent with the project requirements in terms of post spacing and absence of artifacts. The point cloud underwent classification to determine bare-earth points (class 2), noise points (class 7), water returns (class 9), and unclassified data (class 1). Class 12 contains LiDAR points removed from the overlap region between adjacent flight lines.
        1 2010-06-01T00:00:00 The NOAA Coastal Services Center (CSC) received files in LAS format. The files contained LiDAR intensity and elevation measurements. CSC performed the following processing on the data to make it available within Digital Coast: 1. The data were converted from State Plane Florida East coordinates to geographic coordinates. 2. The data were converted from NAVD88 heights to ellipsoid heights using Geoid03. 3. The LAS header fields were sorted by latitude and updated.
        1 2011-06-20T00:00:00 The NOAA National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC) received lidar data files via ftp transfer from the NOAA Coastal Services Center. The data are currently being served via NOAA CSC Digital Coast at http://www.csc.noaa.gov/digitalcoast/. The data can be used to re-populate the system. The data are archived in LAS or LAZ format. The LAS format is an industry standard for LiDAR data developed by the American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS); LAZ is a loseless compressed version of LAS developed by Martin Isenburg (http://www.laszip.org/). The data are exclusively in geographic coordinates (either NAD83 or ITRF94). The data are referenced vertically to the ellipsoid (either GRS80 or ITRF94), allowing for the ability to apply the most up to date geoid model when transforming to orthometric heights.
        Top

        MI_Operation

        none found
        Top

        MI_Platform

        none found
        Top

        MI_Instrument

        none found
        Top