ISO Table View Alternate Views: Get Data, FAQ, ISO Rubric, DOI Rubric, CSW, HTML, Components, XML

Metadata Identifier: gov.noaa.csc.maps:2010_OR_DOGAMI_Crater_Lake_m1428

Aggregation Info | Bands | Citations | Constraints | Coverage Descriptions | Dimensions | Extents | Formats | Geographic Bounding Box
Georectified Information | Georeferenceable Information | Identifiers | Instruments | Mediums | OnlineResources | Operations
Platforms | Process Steps | Range Elements | Reference Systems | Responsible Parties | Series | Sources | Spatial Grids | Temporal Extents

MD_DataIdentification

Count Component Title Abstract
1 2010 Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI) Lidar: Crater Lake Study Area The Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI) contracted with Watershed Sciences, Inc. to collect high resolution topographic LiDAR data for multiple areas within the State of Oregon. The areas for LiDAR collection have been designed as part of a collaborative effort of state, federal, and local agencies in order to meet a wide range of project goals. This LiDAR data set was collected August 23, 24, 31, Sept 2 - 5, 2010 and falls mainly in Klamath County, and very small portions of Douglas and Jackson counties in Oregon. This data set consists of bare earth and unclassified points. The average pulse density is 8.39 pulses per square meter over terrestrial surfaces. The area of interest (AOI) totals 283 square miles (181,081 acres) and the total area flown (TAF) covers 308 square miles (197,011 acres). The TAF acreage is greater than the original AOI acreage due to buffering and flight planning optimization. In some areas of heavy vegetation or forest cover, there may be relatively few ground points in the LiDAR data. Elevation values for open water surfaces are not valid elevation values because few LiDAR points are returned from water surfaces. LiDAR intensity values were also collected.
Top

SV_Identification

none found
Top

CI_Citation

Count Component Title Date Citation Identifier
1 2010 Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI) Lidar: Crater Lake Study Area
  • 2012-01-01
2 None
    1 North American Datum 1983
    • 2007-01-19
    Top

    CI_Series

    none found
    Top

    CI_ResponsibleParty

    Count Component Individual Organization Position Email Role Linkage
    1 Mike Sutherland(author) author
    1 resourceProvider http://www.epsg-registry.org/export.htm?gml=urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4269
    1 NOAA CSC (publisher) publisher
    1 NOAA CSC(distributor) distributor
    2 NOAA CSC (processor) processor
    1 EPSG Registry European Petroleum Survey Group publisher http://www.epsg-registry.org/
    1 Ian Madin DOGAMI ian.madin@dogami.state.or.us pointOfContact
    1 Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI) originator
    1 Watershed Sciences, Inc. watershedsciences.com processor
    Unresolved Xlinks
    Mike Sutherland(author) at: /gmi:MI_Metadata/gmd:contact[1]
    NOAA CSC (originator) at: /gmi:MI_Metadata/gmd:identificationInfo[1]/gmd:MD_DataIdentification[1]/gmd:citation[1]/gmd:CI_Citation[1]/gmd:citedResponsibleParty[1]
    NOAA CSC (publisher) at: /gmi:MI_Metadata/gmd:identificationInfo[1]/gmd:MD_DataIdentification[1]/gmd:citation[1]/gmd:CI_Citation[1]/gmd:citedResponsibleParty[3]
    NOAA CSC(distributor) at: /gmi:MI_Metadata/gmd:distributionInfo[1]/gmd:MD_Distribution[1]/gmd:distributor[1]/gmd:MD_Distributor[1]/gmd:distributorContact[1]
    Mike Sutherland at: /gmi:MI_Metadata/gmd:distributionInfo[1]/gmd:MD_Distribution[1]/gmd:distributor[2]/gmd:MD_Distributor[1]/gmd:distributorContact[1]
    NOAA CSC (processor) at: /gmi:MI_Metadata/gmd:dataQualityInfo[1]/gmd:DQ_DataQuality[1]/gmd:lineage[1]/gmd:LI_Lineage[1]/gmd:processStep[2]/gmi:LE_ProcessStep[1]/gmd:processor[1]
    Mike Sutherland (processor) at: /gmi:MI_Metadata/gmd:dataQualityInfo[1]/gmd:DQ_DataQuality[1]/gmd:lineage[1]/gmd:LI_Lineage[1]/gmd:processStep[3]/gmi:LE_ProcessStep[1]/gmd:processor[1]
    Top

    CI_OnlineResource

    Count Component Linkage Name Description Function
    1 http://www.epsg-registry.org/ European Petroleum Survey Group Geodetic Parameter Registry Registry that accesses the EPSG Geodetic Parameter Dataset, which is a structured dataset of Coordinate Reference Systems and Coordinate Transformations. search
    1 http://www.epsg-registry.org/export.htm?gml=urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4269 NAD83 Link to Geographic Markup Language (GML) description of reference system. information
    Top

    MD_Identifier or RS_Identifier

    Count Component Code
    1 Ellipsoid in Meters
    1 urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4269
    Top

    EX_Extent

    Bounding Box Temporal Extent
    Count Component Description West East North South Start End
    1 -122.307267 -121.962267 43.093809 42.765609 2010-08-23 2010-09-05
    Top

    EX_GeographicBoundingBox

    Count Component West East North South
    1 -122.307267 -121.962267 43.093809 42.765609
    Top

    EX_TemporalExtent

    Count Component Start End
    1 2010-08-23 2010-09-05
    Top

    MD_Format

    Count Component Name Version specification
    1 LAZ
    Top

    MD_Medium

    none found
    Top

    MD_Constraints

    Unresolved Xlinks
    Lidar Use Limitation at: /gmi:MI_Metadata/gmd:identificationInfo[1]/gmd:MD_DataIdentification[1]/gmd:resourceConstraints[1]
    NOAA Legal Statement at: /gmi:MI_Metadata/gmd:identificationInfo[1]/gmd:MD_DataIdentification[1]/gmd:resourceConstraints[2]
    Top

    MD_ReferenceSystem

    Count Component Code Authority Title
    1 Ellipsoid Ellipsoid in Meters
    1 NAD83 urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4269 North American Datum 1983
    Top

    MD_GridSpatialRepresentation

    none found
    Top

    MD_Georeferenceable or MI_Georeferenceable

    none found
    Top

    MD_Georectified or MI_Georectified

    none found
    Top

    MD_Dimension

    none found
    Top

    MD_CoverageDescription or MI_CoverageDescription

    none found
    Top

    MD_Band or MI_Band

    none found
    Top

    MI_RangeElementDescription

    none found
    Top

    MD_AggregateInformation

    none found
    Top

    LE_Source or LI_Source

    none found
    Top

    LE_ProcessStep or LI_ProcessStep

    Count Component DateTime Description
    1 2011-01-01T00:00:00 No metadata was provided to NOAA CSC along with this lidar data set. The following process step contains information derived from the metadata record of another 2010 Oregon DOGAMI lidar data set and the Watershed Sciences, Inc. lidar report. This lidar report may be accessed at: ftp://ftp.csc.noaa.gov/pub/crs/beachmap/qa_docs/or/crater_lake/OLC_Crater_Lake.pdf Acquisition 1. The lidar data were collected August 23, 24, 31, Sept 2 - 5, 2010. 2. The survey used four Leica ALS50 lidar systems and three aircraft. ALS60 sensors were mounted in both a Cessna Caravan 208B and a Partenavia P-68. Two ALS50 Phase II sensors were co-mounted in a separate Cessna Caravan 208B. 3. Near nadir scan angles were used to increase penetration of vegetation to ground surfaces. 4. Ground level GPS and aircraft IMU were collected during the flight. Processing 1. Flight lines and data were reviewed to ensure complete coverage of the study area and positional accuracy of the laser points. 2. Laser point return coordinates were computed using ALS Post Processor software and IPAS Pro GPS/INS software, based on independent data from the LiDAR system, IMU, and aircraft. 3. The raw LiDAR file was assembled into flight lines per return with each point having an associated x, y, and z coordinate. 4. Visual inspection of swath to swath laser point consistencies within the study area were used to perform manual refinements of system alignment. 5. Custom algorithms were designed to evaluate points between adjacent flight lines. Automated system alignment was computed based upon randomly selected swath to swath accuracy measurements that consider elevation, slope, and intensities. Specifically, refinement in the combination of system pitch, roll and yaw offset parameters optimize internal consistency. 6. Noise (e.g., pits and birds) was filtered using ALS postprocessing software, based on known elevation ranges and included the removal of any cycle slips. 7. Using TerraScan and Microstation, ground classifications utilized custom settings appropriate to the study area. 8. The corrected and filtered return points were compared to the RTK ground survey points collected to verify the vertical and horizontal accuracies. 9. Points were output as laser points, TINed and GRIDed surfaces
    1 2012-12-01T00:00:00 The NOAA Coastal Services Center (CSC) received the files in las format. The files contained LiDAR elevation and intensity measurements. The data were in OGIC (HARN), Oregon Statewide Lambert Conformal Conic projection, NAVD88 (Geoid03) vertical datum and units in International Feet. CSC performed the following processing for data storage and Digital Coast provisioning purposes: 1. The data were converted from OGIC(HARN) NAD83 coordinates to geographic coordinates. 2. The data were converted from NAVD88 (orthometric) heights to GRS80 (ellipsoid) heights using Geoid03. 3. The data were converted from International Feet to meters 4. The data were sorted by time. 5. The data were converted to LAZ format.
    NOAA CSC (processor) at Xpath: /gmi:MI_Metadata/gmd:dataQualityInfo[1]/gmd:DQ_DataQuality[1]/gmd:lineage[1]/gmd:LI_Lineage[1]/gmd:processStep[2]/gmi:LE_ProcessStep[1]/gmd:processor[1]
    1 2013-04-25T00:00:00 The NOAA National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC) received lidar data files via ftp transfer from the NOAA Coastal Services Center. The data are currently being served via NOAA CSC Digital Coast at http://www.csc.noaa.gov/digitalcoast/. The data can be used to re-populate the system. The data are archived in LAS or LAZ format. The LAS format is an industry standard for LiDAR data developed by the American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS); LAZ is a loseless compressed version of LAS developed by Martin Isenburg (http://www.laszip.org/). The data are exclusively in geographic coordinates (either NAD83 or ITRF94). The data are referenced vertically to the ellipsoid (either GRS80 or ITRF94), allowing for the ability to apply the most up to date geoid model when transforming to orthometric heights.
    Mike Sutherland (processor) at Xpath: /gmi:MI_Metadata/gmd:dataQualityInfo[1]/gmd:DQ_DataQuality[1]/gmd:lineage[1]/gmd:LI_Lineage[1]/gmd:processStep[3]/gmi:LE_ProcessStep[1]/gmd:processor[1]
    Top

    MI_Operation

    none found
    Top

    MI_Platform

    none found
    Top

    MI_Instrument

    none found
    Top