<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<metadata>
<idinfo>
<datsetid> gov.noaa.csc.maps:2010_OR_DOGAMI_Yambo_m1077 </datsetid>
<citation>
<citeinfo>
<origin>
Department of Commerce (DOC), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Ocean Service (NOS),
Coastal Services Center (CSC)
</origin>
<origin>Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI)</origin>
<pubdate>201112</pubdate>
<title>2010 Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI) Lidar: Yambo Study Area</title>
<pubinfo>
<pubplace>Charleston, SC</pubplace>
<publish>NOAA's Ocean Service (NOS), Coastal Services Center (CSC)</publish>
</pubinfo>
<onlink>http://www.csc.noaa.gov/dataviewer/index.html?action=advsearch&amp;qType=in&amp;qFld=ID&amp;qVal=1077</onlink>
<onlink>http://www.csc.noaa.gov/lidar</onlink>
<onlink>http://www.csc.noaa.gov</onlink>
</citeinfo>
</citation>
<descript>
<abstract>
The Oregon Department of Geology &amp; Mineral Industries (DOGAMI) contracted with Watershed Sciences, Inc. to collect high
resolution topographic LiDAR data for multiple areas within the State of Oregon. The areas for LiDAR collection have been designed
as part of a collaborative effort of state, federal, and local agencies in order to meet a wide range of project goals.

This LiDAR data set was collected in 7 delivery areas from January 3 through July 14, 2010 and encompasses portions of the following
counties in Oregon: Lincoln, Polk, Tillamook and Yamhill. This data set consists of bare earth and unclassified points.
The average point density is 9.17 points per square meter over terrestrial surfaces. In some areas of heavy vegetation or forest cover, there
may be relatively few ground points in the LiDAR data. Elevation values for open water surfaces are not valid elevation values because
few LiDAR points are returned from water surfaces. LiDAR intensity values were also collected.

This LiDAR data set was collected on different dates and organized into 7 deliveries. To determine which delivery or deliveries are in
your area of interest, download yambo_deliveries.pdf at:
ftp://ftp.csc.noaa.gov/pub/crs/beachmap/qa_docs/or/yambo/yambo_deliveries.pdf

The specific date of collection and total area covered for each delivery are listed below.

Delivery 1:   Date of Collection: 20100414              Total Area =  10,760 sq acres
Delivery 2:   Date of Collection: 20100301-20100605     Total Area =  62,451 sq acres
Delivery 3:   Date of Collection: 20100507-20100714     Total Area = 122,938 sq acres
Delivery 4:   Date of Collection: 20100103-20100527     Total Area =  97,317 sq acres
Delivery 5:   Date of Collection: 20100103-20100527     Total Area = 147,839 sq acres
Delivery 6:   Date of Collection: 20100305-20100515     Total Area =  84,277 sq acres
Delivery 7:   Date of Collection: 20100317-20100714     Total Area = 167,271 sq acres
</abstract>
<purpose>Provide high resolution terrain elevation and land cover elevation data.</purpose>
<supplinf>
The final LiDAR Report for the Yambo study area may be accessed at:
ftp://ftp.csc.noaa.gov/pub/crs/beachmap/qa_docs/or/yambo/Yambo_Report_All_Areas.doc

A footprint of this data set may be viewed in Google Earth at:
ftp://ftp.csc.noaa.gov/pub/crs/beachmap/qa_docs/or/yambo/2010_Oregon_DOGAMI_Yambo_Lidar.kmz
</supplinf>
</descript>
<timeperd>
<timeinfo>
<rngdates>
<begdate>20100301</begdate>
<enddate>20100714</enddate>
</rngdates>
</timeinfo>
<current>ground condition</current>
</timeperd>
<status>
<progress>Complete</progress>
<update>none planned</update>
</status>
<spdom>
<bounding>
<westbc>-124.017166</westbc>
<eastbc>-123.013066</eastbc>
<northbc>45.428381</northbc>
<southbc>44.745281</southbc>
</bounding>
</spdom>
<keywords>
<theme>
<themekt>ISO 19115 Topic Category</themekt>
<themekey>elevation</themekey>
</theme>
<theme>
<themekt>None</themekt>
<themekey>Bathymetry/Topography</themekey>
<themekey>LiDAR</themekey>
<themekey>Light Detection and Ranging</themekey>
<themekey>DEM</themekey>
<themekey>Digital Terrain Model</themekey>
<themekey>DOGAMI</themekey>
<themekey>Elevation data</themekey>
<themekey>Bare earth</themekey>
<themekey>High-resolution</themekey>
<themekey>Bare ground</themekey>
<themekey>DTM</themekey>
</theme>
<place>
<placekt>None</placekt>
<placekey>United States</placekey>
<placekey>Oregon</placekey>
<placekey>Pacific Northwest</placekey>
<placekey>Lincoln County</placekey>
<placekey>Polk County</placekey>
<placekey>Tillamook County</placekey>
<placekey>Yamhill County</placekey>
</place>
</keywords>
<accconst>None</accconst>
<useconst>
Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this data set was collected and some parts of this data may no
longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use this data for critical applications without a full awareness of its
limitations.
</useconst>
<ptcontac>
<cntinfo>
<cntorgp>
<cntorg>DOGAMI</cntorg>
<cntper>Ian Madin</cntper>
</cntorgp>
<cntaddr>
<addrtype>mailing and physical</addrtype>
<address>800 NE Oregon St. #28, Ste. 965</address>
<city>Portland</city>
<state>OR</state>
<postal>97232</postal>
<country>USA</country>
</cntaddr>
<cntvoice>971-673-1542</cntvoice>
<cntemail>ian.madin@dogami.state.or.us</cntemail>
</cntinfo>
</ptcontac>
<browse>
<browsen>ftp://ftp.csc.noaa.gov/pub/crs/beachmap/qa_docs/or/yambo/2010_Oregon_DOGAMI_Yambo_Lidar.kmz</browsen>
<browsed>This graphic shows the lidar coverage for the Yambo Study Area.</browsed>
<browset>kmz</browset>
</browse>
<datacred>DOGAMI</datacred>
<native>Microsoft Windows XP Version 5.1 (Build 2600) Service Pack 2; ESRI ArcCatalog 9.2.0.1324</native>
</idinfo>
<dataqual>
<logic>
Upon receipt from vendor (Watershed Sciences), all LiDAR data was independently reviewed by staff from the Oregon Department of
Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI) to ensure project specifications were met. All data were inventoried for completeness
and data were checked for quality, which included examining LiDAR data for errors associated with internal data consistency,
model quality, and accuracy.
</logic>
<complete>LiDAR data has been collected and processed for all areas within the project study area.</complete>
<posacc>
<horizpa>
<horizpar>Project specifications required the LiDAR foot print to fall within 0.15 and 0.40 meters.</horizpar>
</horizpa>
<vertacc>
<vertaccr>
Absolute accuracy compares known Real Time Kinematic (RTK) ground survey points to the closest laser point. For the Yambo
Study Area, 12,171 RTK points were collected for data delivered. The final vertical accuracy value for the project
is 0.12 ft (0.04 m) RMSE.
</vertaccr>
</vertacc>
</posacc>
<lineage>
<procstep>
<procdesc>
The LiDAR data were collected between January 3 and July 14, 2010. The survey used Leica ALS60 and Leica ALS50 Phase II laser
sensors mounted in multiple Cessna Caravans 208B. The systems were set to acquire greater than or equal to 105,000 laser pulses
per second (i.e. 105 kHz pulse rate) and flown at 900 and 1300 meters above ground level (AGL), capturing a scan angle of
plus or minus 14 degrees from nadir. These settings were developed to yield points with an average native density of greater than
or equal to 8 points per square meter over terrestrial surfaces. The native pulse density is the number of pulses emitted by
the LiDAR system. Some types of surfaces (i.e. dense vegetation or water) may return fewer pulses than the laser originally emitted.
Therefore, the delivered density can be less than the native density and lightly variable according to distributions of terrain,
land cover, and water bodies. The study area was surveyed with opposing flight line side-lap of greater than or equal to 50 percent
(greater than or equal to 100 percent overlap) to reduce laser shadowing and increase surface laser painting. The system allows
up to four range measurements per pulse, and all discernible laser returns were processed for the output dataset. During the LiDAR
survey of the study area, static (1 Hz recording frequency) ground surveys were conducted over either known or set monuments.
After the airborne survey, the static GPS data are processed using triangulation with CORS (continuously operating reference station) and
checked against the Online Positioning User Service (OPUS) to quantify daily variance. Multiple sessions are processed over the
same monument to confirm the antenna height measurements and reported position accuracy.
</procdesc>
<procdate>2010</procdate>
<proccont>
<cntinfo>
<cntorgp>
<cntorg>Watershed Sciences, Inc.</cntorg>
</cntorgp>
<cntaddr>
<addrtype>mailing and physical</addrtype>
<address>215 SE 9th Ave., Suite 106</address>
<city>Portland</city>
<state>OR</state>
<postal>97214</postal>
</cntaddr>
<cntvoice>971-223-5152</cntvoice>
<cntemail>watershedsciences.com</cntemail>
</cntinfo>
</proccont>
</procstep>
<procstep>
<procdesc>
1. Laser point coordinates are computed using the IPAS and ALS Post Processor software suites based on independent data from the
LiDAR system (pulse time, scan angle), and aircraft trajectory data (SBET). Laser point returns (first through fourth) are assigned
an associated (x, y, z) coordinate along with unique intensity values (0-255). The data are output into large LAS v. 1.1 files;
each point maintains the corresponding scan angle, return number (echo), intensity, and x, y, z (easting, northing, and elevation)
information.

2. These initial laser point files are too large to process. To facilitate laser point processing, bins (polygons) are created to divide
the dataset into manageable sizes (&lt; 500 MB). Flightlines and LiDAR data are then reviewed to ensure complete coverage of the study area
and positional accuracy of the laser points.

3. Once the laser point data are imported into bins in TerraScan, a manual calibration is performed to assess the system offsets for pitch,
roll, heading, and mirror scale. Using a geometric relationship developed by Watershed Sciences, each of these offsets is resolved and
corrected if necessary.

4. The LiDAR points are then filtered for noise, pits, and birds by screening for absolute elevation limits, isolated points, and height
above ground. Each bin is then inspected for pits and birds manually; spurious points are removed. For a bin containing approximately
7.5-9.0 million points, an average of 50-100 points are typically found to be artificially low or high. These spurious non-terrestrial
laser points must be removed from the dataset. Common sources of non-terrestrial returns are clouds, birds, vapor, and haze.

5. The internal calibration is refined using TerraMatch. Points from overlapping lines are tested for internal consistency and final
adjustments are made for system misalignments (i.e., pitch, roll, heading offsets and mirror scale). Automated sensor attitude and
scale corrections yield 3-5 cm improvements in the relative accuracy. Once the system misalignments are corrected, vertical GPS drift
is then resolved and removed per flight line, yielding a slight improvement (&lt;1 cm) in relative accuracy. At this point in the workflow,
data have passed a robust calibration designed to reduce inconsistencies from multiple sources (i.e. sensor attitude offsets,
mirror scale, GPS drift) using a procedure that is comprehensive (i.e. uses all of the overlapping survey data). Relative accuracy
screening is complete.

6. The TerraScan software suite is designed specifically for classifying near-ground points (Soininen, 2004). The processing sequence
begins by ‘removing’ all points that are not ‘near’ the earth based on geometric constraints used to evaluate multi-return points.
The resulting bare earth (ground) model is visually inspected and additional ground point modeling is performed in site-specific areas
(over a 50-meter radius) to improve ground detail. This is only done in areas with known ground modeling deficiencies,
such as: bedrock outcrops, cliffs, deeply incised stream banks, and dense vegetation. In some cases, ground point classification
includes known vegetation (i.e., understory, low/dense shrubs, etc.) and these points are manually reclassified as non-grounds.
</procdesc>
<procdate>2010</procdate>
<proccont>
<cntinfo>
<cntorgp>
<cntorg>Watershed Sciences, Inc.</cntorg>
</cntorgp>
<cntaddr>
<addrtype>mailing and physical</addrtype>
<address>215 SE 9th Ave., Suite 106</address>
<city>Portland</city>
<state>OR</state>
<postal>97214</postal>
</cntaddr>
<cntvoice>971-223-5152</cntvoice>
<cntemail>watershedsciences.com</cntemail>
</cntinfo>
</proccont>
</procstep>
<procstep>
<procdesc>
The NOAA Coastal Services Center (CSC) received the files in las format. The files contained LiDAR
elevation and intensity measurements. The data were in Oregon Lambert (NAD83), International Feet coordinates
and NAVD88 (Geoid 03) vertical datum. CSC performed the following processing for data storage and provisioning purposes:
1. The data were converted from Oregon Lambert (NAD83), International Feet coordinates to geographic coordinates.
2. The data were converted from NAVD88 (orthometric) heights to GRS80 (ellipsoid) heights using Geoid 03.
3. The vertical units of the data were converted from International feet to meters.
4. The data were sorted by latitude and the headers were updated.
</procdesc>
<procdate>2011</procdate>
<proccont>
<cntinfo>
<cntorgp>
<cntorg>NOAA Coastal Services Center</cntorg>
</cntorgp>
<cntaddr>
<addrtype>mailing and physical</addrtype>
<address>2234 South Hobson Ave.</address>
<city>Charleston</city>
<state>SC</state>
<postal>29405-2413</postal>
<country>US</country>
</cntaddr>
<cntvoice>843-740-1200</cntvoice>
<cntemail>csc.info@noaa.gov</cntemail>
<cntinst>For questions please use the form at http://www.csc.noaa.gov/contact/contactForm.htm</cntinst>
</cntinfo>
</proccont>
</procstep>
<procstep>
    <procdesc> The NOAA National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC) received Lidar data files by ftp. The data received compressed containing LiDAR data from the NOAA Coastal Services Center. The data are currently being served via Digital Coastl at http://www.csc.noaa.gov/digitalcoast/. The data can be used to re-populate the system. The data are provided in LAS format. LAS format is an industry standard for serving LiDAR data. The data are exclusively in geographic coordinates, however, the datums used vary. Most are NAD 83, however some are in ITRF. Vertical systems include both ellipsoid (ITRF and NAD 83) and NAVD 88. For NAVD 88 values, Geiod 03 is primarily used; however, data received in NAVD 88 prior to 2003 was processed using Geoid 99. </procdesc>
    <procdate> 20120229 </procdate>
    <proccont>
        <cntinfo>
            <cntorgp>
                <cntorg> DOC/NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC > National Geophysical Data Center, NESDIS, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce </cntorg>
                <cntper> Pamela Grothe </cntper>
            </cntorgp>
            <cntaddr>
                <addrtype> Mailing and Physical Address </addrtype>
                <address> NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC E/GC1 325 Broadway </address>
                <city> Boulder </city>
                <state> CO </state>
                <postal> 80305-3328 </postal>
                <country> USA </country>
            </cntaddr>
            <cntvoice> (303) 497-6120 </cntvoice>
            <cnttdd> (303) 497-6958 </cnttdd>
            <cntfax> (303) 497-6513 </cntfax>
            <cntemail> pamela.grothe@noaa.gov </cntemail>
            <hours> 7:30-5:00 Mountain </hours>
            <cntinst> Contact Data Center </cntinst>
        </cntinfo>
    </proccont>
</procstep>
</lineage>
</dataqual>
<spdoinfo>
<direct>Point</direct>
</spdoinfo>
<spref>
<horizsys>
<geograph>
<latres>0.0000001</latres>
<longres>0.0000001</longres>
<geogunit>Decimal degrees</geogunit>
</geograph>
<geodetic>
<horizdn>North American Datum of 1983</horizdn>
<ellips>Geodetic Reference System 80</ellips>
<semiaxis>6378137.000000</semiaxis>
<denflat>298.257222</denflat>
</geodetic>
</horizsys>
<vertdef>
<altsys>
<altdatum>Ellipsoid</altdatum>
<altres>0.001</altres>
<altunits>Meters</altunits>
<altenc>Explicit elevation coordinate included with horizontal coordinates</altenc>
</altsys>
</vertdef>
</spref>
<distinfo>
<distrib>
<cntinfo>
<cntorgp>
<cntorg>NOAA Coastal Services Center</cntorg>
</cntorgp>
<cntaddr>
<addrtype>mailing and physical</addrtype>
<address>2234 South Hobson Ave.</address>
<city>Charleston</city>
<state>SC</state>
<postal>29405-2413</postal>
<country>US</country>
</cntaddr>
<cntvoice>843-740-1200</cntvoice>
<cntemail>csc.info@noaa.gov</cntemail>
<cntinst>For questions please use the form at http://www.csc.noaa.gov/contact/contactForm.htm</cntinst>
</cntinfo>
</distrib>
<resdesc>Downloadable Data</resdesc>
<distliab>
Any conclusions drawn from the analysis of this information are not the responsibility of the Oregon
Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI), the Coastal Services Center or its partners.
</distliab>
<custom>
This data can be obtained on-line at the following URL:
http://www.csc.noaa.gov/dataviewer/index.html?action=advsearch&amp;qType=in&amp;qFld=ID&amp;qVal=1077
This data set is dynamically generated based on user-specified parameters.
</custom>
</distinfo>
<distinfo>
    <distrib>
        <cntinfo>
            <cntorgp>
                <cntorg> DOC/NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC > National Geophysical Data Center, NESDIS, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce </cntorg>
                <cntper> Pamela Grothe </cntper>
            </cntorgp>
            <cntaddr>
                <addrtype> Mailing and Physical Address </addrtype>
                <address> NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC E/GC1 325 Broadway </address>
                <city> Boulder </city>
                <state> CO </state>
                <postal> 80305-3328 </postal>
                <country> USA </country>
            </cntaddr>
            <cntvoice> (303) 497-6120 </cntvoice>
            <cnttdd> (303) 497-6958 </cnttdd>
            <cntfax> (303) 497-6513 </cntfax>
            <cntemail> pamela.grothe@noaa.gov </cntemail>
            <hours> 7:30-5:00 Mountain </hours>
            <cntinst> Contact Data Center </cntinst>
        </cntinfo>
    </distrib>
    <distliab> Disclaimer While every effort has been made to ensure that these data are accurate and reliable within the limits of the current state of the art, NOAA cannot assume liability for any damages caused by any errors or omissions in the data, nor as a result of the failure of the data to function on a particular system. NOAA makes no warranty, expressed or implied, nor does the fact of distribution constitute such a warranty. </distliab>
    <custom> The National Geophysical Data Center serves as the archive for this LIDAR data. NGDC should only be contacted for this data if it cannot be obtained from NOAA Coastal Services Center. </custom>
</distinfo>
<metainfo>
<metd> 20120229 </metd>
<metrd> 20120229 </metrd>
<metfrd> 20130229 </metfrd>
<metc>
<cntinfo>
<cntorgp>
<cntorg>NOAA Coastal Services Center</cntorg>
</cntorgp>
<cntaddr>
<addrtype>mailing and physical</addrtype>
<address>2234 South Hobson Ave.</address>
<city>Charleston</city>
<state>SC</state>
<postal>29405-2413</postal>
<country>US</country>
</cntaddr>
<cntvoice>843-740-1200</cntvoice>
<cntemail>csc.info@noaa.gov</cntemail>
<cntinst>For questions please use the form at http://www.csc.noaa.gov/contact/contactForm.htm</cntinst>
</cntinfo>
</metc>
<metstdn>FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata</metstdn>
<metstdv>FGDC-STD-001-1998</metstdv>
</metainfo>
</metadata>
